Dictionaries and potential literature.

clip-art-categories-clip-art-basics-animals-clip-art-awareness-ribbons-kzmebs-clipart

On my other blog The Door is Ajar, I recently reviewed a book by Joe Fiorito, Rust is a Form of Fire (you can read my post in its entirety here).  In his introduction to the book, Fiorito acknowledges the influence of George Perec and his book An Attempt at Exhausting a Place in Paris (1974), as well as a literary movement Perec was a part of: Ouvroir de Littérature Potentielle (usually known as OuLiPo).  OuLiPo – which I had never heard of until reading Fiorito’s book – encouraged writers to see “potential literature” everywhere, and used what I’d consider restrictive writing exercises to create new, bold works (sometimes out of old ones).

Consider N+7.  This was a way to alter existing text by replacing every noun (N) in a work with whatever noun followed the original seven (7) entries later in the dictionary.  Another procrastination tool or super good fun?  Maybe both!  I don’t believe in writer’s block, but if you do (and you’re suffering from it), this might be the way to get the words flowing again….

At any rate, mulling over the possibilities of N+7 got me thinking about dictionaries, mostly about how no one really seems to have a print copy of them anymore.  If you need to look up the definition and usage of a word, you just plug it into whatever word processing software or search engine you regularly use and in a microsecond, you have it right there in your face. You don’t even really need to know how to spell the word – there are so many ways to retrieve it even if you come up with merely a close approximation.

We have print dictionaries at the library, but they are circulating less and less, and the beautiful hefty reference copies are rarely taken from the shelf.  I love print dictionaries and have a few at home; although a search engine is way more efficient, sometimes it’s just plain pleasant to turn the pages of the print copies and pore through the entries.

So, with dictionary in hand, here is an excerpt from my book review of Fiorito’s Rust is a Form of Fire – the original is first, followed by the N+7 version.  Please note that I am using N+7 without taking into account proper nouns and pronouns.

Over the course of three days, he spent several hours sitting near the intersection of Victoria and Queen in the bustling metropolis, and recorded all of his observations of the scenes around him:  snippets of conversations, what people were wearing, what they were drinking or eating, what the temperature was, interesting features about buildings around him…you name it.

Over the court card of three daydreams, he spent several house arrests sitting near the intertrigo of Victoria and Queen in the bustling mew, and recorded all of his obstacles of the scent-bags around him: snoods of conversions, what pepperboxes were wearing, what they were drinking or eating, what the temple was, interesting federations about bulbuls around him…you name it.

Potential literature?  Perhaps –  I did learn a few new words in the process!  And I must apologize for my juvenile sense of humour, but the “obstacles of the scent-bags” makes me giggle. Might be the title of my next short story….

Do you still use a print dictionary?  

Do you use writing exercises to inspire new work?

Clipart credit.
Advertisements

25 thoughts on “Dictionaries and potential literature.

  1. 🙂 I considered using the same method for my comment, but it is far too late to get my dictionary out and my brain functioning! When playing Scrabble at my parents’ house we use a ‘real’ dictionary for any checking of spelling. But I haven’t picked up a dictionary for translating for years now. They are such cumbersome objects, I am so glad of the internet versions. It is somehow a shame though. I used to love flicking through the pages to find the right word…

    • When I’m writing, I’m usually at a computer, so it’s just an automatic thing to use the online dictionaries…it’s far more convenient. But I’m like you, I miss flipping through a print version, and it was rather fun to take one out and do this writing exercise. And my family, like yours, still uses a print dictionary for Scrabble! 🙂

  2. I am an old-fashioned girl and I still use a print dictionary in preference to anything on line. N+7 is a laugh – I liked the obstacles of scent-bags too but was also intrigued by ‘snoods of conversions’!

    • I love that you use print dictionaries while reading printed books – it’s a good learning experience and enhances the reading. I think a lot of us tend to gloss over words we don’t understand and then forget to look them up afterwards…it’s better to stop and check them right away.

  3. What a fun post, Sheryl. I still have a couple of bound dictionaries, but must confess that I use the web now when looking for a synonym or the correct spelling of a word I’m struggling to get right. I used to love thumbing through dictionaries. What wonderful books.

      • I see those errors as well. Poor spelling and poor editing. And yes, I always look up words, and cringe when I’ve misused one after the fact. I’m famous for interchanging there with their or using it’s when its is called for. I know at some level, but my typing fingers get me in trouble.

        I repeat in my head: It’s an itchy dog scratching its fleas.

    • It’s true…few people seem to have them at home anymore; I’m not even sure if school children need one for classes. Although the new bookstores still carry them, the used bookstores and thrift shops probably don’t even take them anymore – they’d be saturated with them!

  4. I do use printed dictionaries, and love them as much as ever. What I do appreciate, in terms of online resources, is the Online Etymology Dictionary. I use it far more than a regular dictionary, and hate to confess how much time can pass when I decide a visit’s in order.

  5. I sure do use a print dictionary. Two, to be precise. My favorite is the Oxford American Dictionary, but I also use Merriam-Webster’s, too. Wouldn’t be without them.

  6. I’m surprised how fun the result is. I have many OuLiPo publications, but have seen few good examples of N+7. I write code that gives me text I then edit into books, so seeing as I’m planning a dictionary / thesaurus layer of code for building narratives from ground up, I should clearly consider an N+7 option.

I'm delighted to hear from you - thanks so much for your comments!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s